Home     About Us     Book     Services     Testing     Contact    

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Employment: Is Obama a lousy job provider?

In August 2011 The American Jobs’ Act was created in an effort to boost employment. A budget of over $447 billion promised to restore 2007 levels of employment at below 5%. Where do we stand today and what are the real unemployment numbers? Is Obama really doing a good job of giving Americans the jobs they need and deserve? Or, is the current Administration doing its best to show unreal numbers, as we are approaching the 2012 elections?

Current figures seem promising. Per the U.S. Bureau of Labor & Statistics (BLS), nonfarm payroll employment rose by 227,000 in February 2012. The official number of unemployed persons, at 12.8 million, was essentially unchanged in February. The unemployment rate held at 8.3 percent, 0.8 percentage point below the August 2011 rate. The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks and over) was little changed at 5.4 million in February. These individuals accounted for 42.6 percent of the unemployed. Keep the rate at 8%, some say, and US citizens will forget the 10% + of last year! This is good for upcoming electoral debates…

Alternate Unemployment figures

The reality might be very different, as recognized by many independent analysts. What official numbers never show are the long-term discouraged workers – those who gave up looking for a job. Per John William of SGS (Shadow Government Statistics - shadowstats.com), the seasonally-adjusted Alternate Unemployment Rate reflects current unemployment reporting methodology adjusted for those long-term discouraged workers, who were defined out of official existence in 1994. When that estimate is added to the BLS estimate of U-6 unemployment, which includes short-term discouraged workers, the real number of unemployed shows a much, much higher picture (see below).

clip_image002




















What is the REAL unemployment rate then?

You determine the real unemployment rate through a simple calculation:  divide the total amount of people out of work (but seeking employment), by the total amount of people that are employed and in the work force. Logically this does not seem complicated. But there is a problem:

Every week government officials try to obtain the most accurate numbers of people that are in the workforce and those that are unemployed and still looking for work. But how about those who gave up looking for a job? Per the DOL, a worker must be actively looking for a job to be considered in the labor force and to be counted as unemployed.  Workers that are discouraged and not actively seeking a job are NOT counted as unemployed.

According to lubbockonline.com, this issue strongly questions the calculation for the real unemployment rate. Some estimates are that at least 1.2 million people dropped off the list – those that may be discouraged, but regardless, have stopped actively looking for jobs. While the current Administration proudly stated that 243,000 jobs had been created just in last January, no mention has been made by Obama or the White House that 1.2 million people gave up looking for work in January.  These 1.2 million people were removed from the group of persons who are reported to be unemployed, dropping the pretend unemployment number to 8.3%.

The reality is that 4.7 million jobs have simply disappeared from the United States of America since Obama became President.Added to the 12.7 million, the total of unemployed is 17.4 million without work or about 11%. When one adds in the 10.5 million who are working part time but would like to be working full time, we have 28 million who are unemployed or underemployed.  This is an unemployment rate of 17%. If one then adds the 2% of our population who are in jails or prisons, the actual unemployment rate is at or about 19%!

Predicting the future of employment – and what it means for you as an employer

For every available job there are today almost 5 people looking for one. Nearly half of all the unemployed (45.9%) have been out of work for longer than six months. In fact, most of the 6 millions of long-term unemployed Americans have been out of work for one year or more. This is the highest long-term unemployment rate since World War II. In my book “No-Fail Hiring” I clearly demonstrate how a tougher, more volatile job market will impact your search for productive, loyal and dedicated staff. My predictions are the following:

Prediction no.1:
The Federal Government has started making hiring much more challenging – under the cover of offering huge incentives to companies for hiring the long-term unemployed. Expect new regulations which will make it much harder for you to dehire. As the Federal and State governments fail to contribute to the improvement of the job market, one easier way will indeed be to regulate it with drastic measures. The strategy is simple: start by making hiring easier (through measures such as tax credits or even bonuses for hiring) and then make it impossible to fire those you have hired.

Prediction no.2
: Too many applicants are now competing for those scarce positions. But do not fall into the trap of thinking this pool of abundance is good news for you. Many applicants will over-rate their skills and personality in order to get the job, making it a serious challenge for you to properly select the best. Remember: a single bad hire can cost between $60,000 and $120,000. The continuing economic struggle will lead more people to put their attention on money as the main motivator to get a new job. This is the worst thing that can happen to you as a leader. Money never buys real loyalty, less honesty.

Prediction no.3
: Honesty is going to be more than ever the major issue in pre-selecting applicants. The fact that dishonest employees can cost your company thousands or even millions of dollars is probably not unknown to you. But we believe this issue is going to become a much more serious concern. Besides observing a decreasing level of morale in the society, evidence of dishonest applicants lying in their search for the perfect job is quite alarming.

Prediction no.4
: The real upcoming shortage is going to be more about quality, rather than quantity. Expect a tougher war for talent where skilled applicants feel almighty and experienced employees can leverage their real value for higher compensations with your competitors. The REAL shortage is going to be a lack of soft-skilled people of all ages. It is more challenging to develop soft skills than technical ones. Have you ever tried to improve an employee’s willingness and commitment (without having to use the money bait), no matter how competent he/she was? Not easy…

The opportunity

In face of this “not-so-optimistic” view of the future in the job market, what is your real challenge going to be? Mainly, you will need to work smarter at ATTRACTING qualified players – not just finding them! The good news is that we believe the current radical changes in the job market will be playing to the advantage of smart employers. The employment market used to be more active among already employed people, with over 85% of openings filled by people already employed. We believe this is dramatically changing.

Current employees who are secretly looking for another job are now competing with many available applicants who may have the same or higher qualifications. Many of those who lost their job for reasons independent from personal performance may be more flexible on the pay side; they may also present better soft skills such as: better work ethics, willingness to work hard and to learn, etc.

The best strategic mindset for business owners is to attract and detect qualified players who are willing to work rather than “enjoy” their unemployment benefits and who are ready to take on new challenges – sometimes at a starting lower pay. People who need a job have a level of necessity (to survive economically and socially) which can be judiciously used to pump up the energy and drive level in the business. You can and should take advantage of the upcoming competition between those unemployed solely due to the economic downturn and those who have a job. Do not assume that the latter are more qualified. What is certain is that they are more expensive.

Patrick Valtin,
Author of “No Fail Hiring.
Need to hire a Top Player fast? Buy the No-Fail Hiring System KIT!

Sunday, February 26, 2012

NEW: NO-FAIL HIRING SYSTEM KIT - by Patrick Valtin

In case you are working on developing a very effective hiring process in your company, have a look at this link. This is the result of my 24 years experience as a professional recruiter and trainer on the subject of personnel selection.
You definitely deserve to surround yourself with able, dedicated, honest and productive people who share your passion for purpose, performance and profits. So this No-Fail Hiring KIT has been developed for your business.
And if your daily work is about hiring new employees and getting them to be operational in the shortest delays, I guarantee that this kit will make your life easier, less stressful and more rewarding!
 
NFH Group of products
This unique and exclusive product includes all the following benefits:
  • The NO-FAIL Hiring book
  • The confidential Workbook
  • The confidential Directives with ALL the legal forms
  • The confidential interview technique
  • the operating manual on my exclusive “RECRU-TE C TEST,”
    a special job-related soft skills analysis.
  • The exclusive DVD “EMOTIONS IN THE WORKPLACE,” featuring Jim Meskimen,
  • PLUS OVER $500.00 OF ADDITIONAL BONUSES
I have made this kit very, very affordable to small businesses. The No-Fail Hiring KIT is the ultimate power tool if you are looking to surround yourself with only the best while avoiding the rest!
I am of course available to answer all your questions. My direct e-mail address is patrick@m2-tec.com and my cell phone number is (727) 687 9647.
To your success,
 
Patrick Valtin,
Author of “No-Fail Hiring.

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Hiring: Beware the “ACE OF SPADES” – by Patrick Valtin

9780979858680-JacketBlue.indd
There are four aces in hiring. It is not about playing cards, it is about picking people who will help you win – and won’t make you feel like you lost your last dollars playing poker. Use the four aces of selection to systematically evaluate each applicant: Performance mindset, willingness, know-how and personality. Like playing cards, these Aces are your most important “hiring cards,” yet they are not equal in value. You must know exactly what you want to measure and in which sequence.


  • Performance mindset: Your Ace of Diamonds. Detecting top players who are naturally high performers is your highest priority. Use “detectors” suggested by our No Fail Hiring™ System in the interview to estimate if an applicant has a strong performance mindset – or not. This factor is the most important one – you hire people for results, not for just “doing things.”

  • Willingness: Your Ace of Hearts. To a large degree you can improve technical skills; but how do you improve attitude? Never compromise with this vital fact: people get hired for their hard skills and get fired for their lack of soft ones. A positive attitude is such a vital soft skill
    that you want to measure it as soon as you can in the hiring process. Willingness to learn, to do new things, to do more than what is expected, to handle problems, etc. are so important! Is estimated that over 77% of hiring failures are due to lack of willingness.

  • Know-how: Your Ace of Clubs. You want to have competent employees who can at least master the basic technical skills as required on the job. The golden rule is: never trust what they say, always test what they should be able to do. Know-how is measured in the doing, not in the talking. you want to know if an applicant can do accounting? Put him or her to the test for 5 to 10 minutes, by challenging hi/her on a practical accounting issue.

  • Personality: Your Ace of Spades. We measure personality last; not because it is the least important evaluation criterion but because if you let yourself be influenced by a “nice” personality, it could offer trouble, or even, potentially, destroy your business! The golden rule is:
    never trust what you see, because you don’t know if it is real! Too many employers fail to detect the difference between temporary personality and the lasting one. don’t fall in the trap of the visible – it might change the next day or week. 

COMING UP

Detecting if an applicant possesses the right hard and soft skills in less than one hour is hardly an exact science. But you can maximize the objectivity of your evaluation with the No-Fail Hiring System. Attend out upcoming workshop on September 8, 2011: visit www.nofailhiring.com/events.php  to find out how you can double or even triple the effectiveness of your hiring procedure.

To your success,
Patrick Valtin President/CEO
M2-TEC USA, INC. Author of “No Fail Hiring

Thursday, August 4, 2011

Hiring: Do it the “Steve Jobs’ way" – by Patrick Valtin

I just finished reading a great and wonderfully inspiring book, “The Innovation Secrets of Steve Jobs,” by Carmine Gallo. I can’t recommend that you read this book enough – and I can’t help but share with you some vital points on hiring that Steve Jobs has constantly applied on his way to build the most respected and admired business in the world.

Apple success over time and Steve Jobs’ reputation as the best entrepreneur of our time can be summarized in a few words: he and his top execs never compromised with the talents and qualifications required of their employees. But they always considered very different qualities in people than most business owners do. When you thoroughly analyze Apple’s philosophy of hiring, you find out that there has always been fundamental and un-compromising attributes needed to get a job at Apple:

  • Vision-minded. Everyone joining the company must have a clear picture of its Management vision – and fully agree to fight for it, to defend it and to live with it every day. Applicants who do not seem to get it are systematically rejected.
  • Innovation-minded. Steve Jobs has always emphasized the vital importance of hiring people who are innovative – willing to create something from nothing. Applicants are first chosen for their ability and willingness to constantly create, rather than for their technical competence. 
  • Future-minded. Employees at Apple are driven by their leader’s vision of the future and they contribute everyday to CREATING the future, more than just beating the competition. Each of them owns the future of the market because they know they can contribute to creating it.
  • Passion-minded. Steve Jobs’ first principle is: “Do what you love.” People are hired because they love the product, the company and its vision. Applicants who do not demonstrate a genuine passion and “love” for the company’s purposes and business philosophy will never make it.
  • Contribution-minded. Sharon Aby worked 3 years as a recruiter for Apple. Her statement is clear enough: “We didn’t want someone who desired to retire with a gold watch. We wanted entrepreneurs, demonstrated winners, high-energy contributors who defined their previous role in terms of what they contributed and not what they titles were.” (1)
  • Engagement-minded. Over two thirds of Americans are not engaged in their workplace.(2) Apple Management is strict on employees’ level of commitment. Committed individuals who are inspired by a grand purpose make the whole difference in the most competitive conditions.
  • Excellence-minded. Steve Jobs is known for his passion of perfection. The company always tries things out until they are perfectly done. The same attitude is expected of every collaborator. Applicants who do not share that passion for excellence do not have a chance.

This is not an exhaustive list of hiring attributes presented by Apple, but a limited set of vital soft skills required by its management of any applicant – not just senior management or high technical positions.

See how you can think with it for your business. And if you wonder how you can detect such attributes in the frame of one hour interview, well… think about NO-FAIL HIRING. It is indeed our specialty to help you detect those invisible soft skills that make the difference between a happy hire… and the start of a non-ending nightmare.

The upcoming one-day “No-Fail Hiring” workshop will be held in Clearwater, Florida, on September 8, 2011. See the details of the program here. And if you are planning to hire at least 5 new employees in the coming 3 to 6 months, you might rather consider an in-office, customized No-Fail Hiring training. Send me a note and I will contact you to find out how I can best help.

You are as successful as the people surrounding you desire to make you and your company successful. So don’t take the chance: Surround yourself with dedicated, productive, loyal and honest people who will share your passion for performance, purpose and profits.

NOTE: not sure if you need this? Do the test!

Patrick Valtin,
Author of “No-Fail Hiring.

(1)     Carmine Gallo, “The Innovations Secrets of Steve Jobs,” page 31. 2011, McGraw-Hill Companies.
(2)     Nancy Mann Jackson, “Wanted: Fully Engaged Employees,” Entrepreneur, April 26, 2010.

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Gloomy Report on Hiring Predictions

Recently, the US Chamber of Commerce published their latest quarterly small business outlook survey. Besides showing what we already know, the report offers a clear picture of the current national uncertainty about the future. 

Confidence is leaving Americans’ heart, in view of irresponsible actions from an Administration unfriendly to small businesses. A commanding 64% of respondents said they have no plans to hire in the next year, underscoring the stalled unemployment numbers and bleak economic forecast. 84% think our country is on the wrong track.



The report prepared for the US Chamber of Commerce by Harris Interactive on 1409 small business owners clearly indicates that a vast majority of them do not intend to hire more employees.

Economic uncertainty is the most important challenge facing small businesses, with 49% ranking it within the top three choices. 
Small business owners also feel challenged by the national debt (47%), the new health care law (39%), and the impact of regulations (36%).



Dealing with uncertainty


In times of uncertainty, the last thing you want as a business owner is to be surrounded by people who do NOT share your passion for profits, purposes and results. 


If the current economic challenges are making it hard for you to expand or even survive, do not make it more complicated by having to spend so much of your time to motivate, supervise, control, order or enforce compliance. Good people need guidance, not orders. Bad people do nothing with guidance and fake complying from fear of punishment. Good people need relationship, more than leadership. Bad people don't care about your leadership nor about your attention.

As Jim Collins, author of "Good to Great" states,

"The Good -to-Great leaders began the transformation by first getting the right people on the bus (and the wrong people off the bus) and then figured out where to drive it."  *   
* "Good to Great," New York, NY. HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.


If you need to replace some employee or plan to hire more, ensure you attract the right caliber. Do not fall in the personality trap: put your attention on measuring/evaluating some "invisible" but vital soft skills such as loyalty, honesty, persistence and a true taste for performance. Surround yourself with fighters who  will engage battles with your competitors - not with you!



Check on this link to see the program of our upcoming No-Fail Hiring workshop, on September 8 2011.

Also, you should do the
Hiring Success Potential Analysis before you start your next hiring mission. It is FREE and it might avoid you a lot of trouble. This powerful assessment will provide valuable information on what you need to do to attract the right people, the top players who do not fear challenges but love them!
Patrick Valtin, author of "No Fail Hiring"
President/CEO of M2-TEC USA, Inc.


Saturday, July 9, 2011

Hard Skills Vs Soft Skills - Don't Fall in the Trap!

We all know that most employees get hired for their hard skills and get fired for the lack of soft ones. Personality is what I call in my book the "the Ace of Spades in the Hiring Game" for a good reason: soft skills most often make the difference between good applicants and the others, but you can't detect some critical soft skill by just asking an applicant to exhibit it. I have never met a candidate who was openly confessing a serious lack of soft skill but I have met thousands of them who pretended to possess many.

Why new employees fail

Contrary to popular belief, technical skills are not the first reason why new hires fail. Instead, interpersonal skills dominate the list, per a survey conducted on 5,247 hiring managers*:


  • 26% of new hires fail because they can't accept feedback.
  • 23% of new hires fail because they are unable to understand and
    manage emotions.
  • 17% of new hires fail because they lack the necessary motivation
    to excel.
  • 15% of new hires fail because they have the wrong temperament
    on the job.
  • Only 11% fail because they lack the necessary technical skills.
During that study, 812 managers experienced significant more hiring success than their peers. What differentiated their interview approach was their emphasis on interpersonal and motivational issues. So make sure you focus your interviewing energy on applicants' coachability, emotional intelligence, motivation and temperament.

* Mark Murphy, "Why New Hires Fail," LeadershipIQ.com, n.d. Web August 15, 2010.


The most important soft skills

No matter what the job is, you should always check for the following
crucial soft skills:

- Honesty, 
- Willingness (eagerness to work hard and to do new things),
- creativity (ability to create or contribute to new ideas and to
  innovate, find solutions to problems),

- Manageability (ability to accept and implement orders or feedback
  from seniors and colleagues),

- Temperament (general attitude towards others, including team
  work and positive attitude),

- Being challenge-driven,
- Drive/self-motivation,
- Communication skills,
- Tolerance to pressure,
- Analytical capacities.

The No-Fail Hiring System precisely focuses on these invisible, hard-to-detect soft skills. Our confidential interview technique allows you to evaluate each of these personality-related skills with optimal objectivity - sometimes within the first 15 minutes.

Hiring soon? 

Make sure you can detect those "invisible" soft skills early in your selection. Buy the book "No-Fail Hiring" on Amazon on on my website. Also, if you plan to hire at least 3 new employees in the coming months, contact me to receive a FREE phone 
assessment of your current hiring process. I can help you minimize subjectivity in your evaluation of these vital soft skills as stated above. you can also call 877-831 2299.


Good luck in your hiring missions,

Patrick Valtin, Author of "No-Fail Hiring"
President CEO M2-TEC USA, Inc.

Thursday, June 23, 2011

SEVEN TYPES OF DISCRIMINATION MANAGERS MUST AVOID, BY L D SLEDGE, J.D.

DISCRIMINATION-FISHThe following article was taken fully from HR Daily Advisor, June 23, 2011

Today's HR Daily Advisor Tip:

The 7 Types of Discrimination Your Managers and Supervisors Must Avoid

Topic: HR Policies and Procedures

In yesterday's Advisor, we found out what fairness means to a jury; today, discrimination, the dark side of fairness, plus an introduction to the famous "50/50": the compendium of 50 employment laws in 50 states.

Nondiscrimination is the legal side of fairness. Illegal discrimination comes in many forms, some obvious and overt, some subtle and hard to spot. Here's what to avoid:

1: Overt discrimination (I don't like Xs)

This is the out-in-the-open type of discrimination that most people think of when they hear the word. For example:

  • I don't like to work with [women, men, old people, white people, black people, Asian people, disabled people].
  • My customers don't like to deal with [women, men, old people, white people, black people, Asian people, disabled people].
  • I don't like to hire [young women because they get pregnant and go on leave].
  • I'm not promoting [anyone over 40—they don't have enough energy].

2: Stereotyping (Xs can't X)

Stereotyping usually takes the form of "Xs can't X."

  • Women aren't strong enough.
  • Men aren't compassionate enough.
  • Xs aren't smart enough.

3: Patronizing (Xs shouldn't X)

This is a special form of stereotyping that seems well-intentioned, but is, in general, discriminatory. For example:

  • Terry is active in the community; he/she won't want to relocate.
  • Parents with young children shouldn't travel.
  • Women shouldn't travel alone.
  • Pregnant women can't [travel, lift, move, be stressed].

4: 'Avoidance' Discrimination

Some managers try to play a game of avoidance discrimination. They say, "If I can get in trouble talking to X, no problem. I'll never talk to X." Don't use this thinking; it is discriminatory and it won't fly.

5: Playing favorites (I always turn to my friends)

All managers have groups with whom they feel most comfortable. But if you always turn to that group when you need to hire, you are discriminating. And you've got friends at work with whom you're comfortable. If they always get the plum projects, bonuses, and promotions, you are discriminating.


Operate in multiple states? That's a real compliance challenge, but with "The 50-50" (50 Employment Laws in 50 States); answers are at your fingertips. Wage/hour? Leave? Child labor? Discrimination? All there in easy-to-read chart form. Get more details.


6: De facto (I just never seem to hire Xs)

One of the more subtle forms of discrimination is called "de facto." In these situations, there are never any direct statements against hiring or promoting certain types of people—it just never seems to happen. For example, you're not against hiring women in a certain job, but although many qualified women have applied, of the last 50 hires, all 50 were men.

7: Reverse discrimination

Reverse discrimination means discrimination against someone as a result of your attempts not to discriminate against someone else. You probably don't have significant exposure unless you have a very strong, quota-type program favoring one protected group